Vibration

Progress report

02 Mar 2014

Elastic foundation

Coefficient of subgrade reaction is in MPa/m or N/m^2/m. There is not document explaining how to convert subgrade reaction to a single spring stiffness to support truss structure. By chance, I chose ks = 99461 N/m as an equivent spring constant and the result of the displacement is similar to the calculation in Nam Il Kim, 2013. I still don’t know how to formulate this model yet. I only doubt that C. V. G. Vllabhan and Y. C. Das, “A refined model for beam on elastic foundations”, 1991, (ref23) use a 1 m x 1 m plate suppor. However, I cannot access this paper from the university profile.

Anyway, below is the result from unit test by vibrating the structure with elastic support and under loading condition

vibration elastic support

vibrate result

Numerical Tests

1. Rao, 2004, 2D structure, 11 members, 6 nodes

image

2. Nam Il Kim, 2013, 2D structure, elastic support, 16 members, 8 nodes

image

3. Nam Il Kim, 2013, 3D structure, elastic support, 36 members, 12 nodes

image

Accuracy

Case 1 Rao 2D


  a. 0.99999994 	0.99999994 	0.99999992 	0.99999998 	0.99999928 	0.99999963 	0.99999997 	0.99999697 	0.99999718 	0.99999996 	0.99999987 	
  b. 0.99999950 	0.99999737 	0.30003350 	0.99999970 	0.99998897 	0.70000161 	0.99999973 	0.99999967 	0.99999999 	0.99999310 	0.99999987 	
  c. 0.99999205 	0.99999842 	0.99999323 	0.99998044 	0.99999845 	0.99999802 	0.99999953 	0.99999993 	0.99999934 	0.00000371 	0.99999806 	

Case 2 Kim 2D


  a. 0.99999902 	0.99999995 	0.99999968 	0.99999813 	0.99999993 	0.99999996 	1.00000000 	0.99999910 	0.99999761 	0.99999985 	0.99999973 	0.99999946 	0.99999881 	0.99999398 	0.99999992 	0.99999913 	
  b. 0.99999997 	0.99999978 	0.99999717 	0.99999774 	0.99999845 	0.99999917 	0.99999989 	0.99999829 	0.29999817 	0.99999999 	0.99999729 	0.99999995 	1.00000000 	0.99999985 	0.99999968 	0.99999996 	
  c. 0.99999778 	0.99999992 	0.99999660 	0.99999521 	0.40004479 	0.99999412 	0.99999997 	0.99999857 	0.99999843 	0.99999991 	0.99997469 	0.99999964 	0.29999698 	0.99999427 	0.99999978 	0.99999572 	

Case 3 Kim 3D

 
  a. 0.99999995 	0.99999995 	0.99999994 	0.99999790 	0.99999934 	1.00000000 	0.99999980 	0.99999998 	0.99999938 	0.99999962 	0.99999999 	0.99999999 	0.99999966 	0.99999999 	0.99999992 	0.99999954 	0.99999915 	0.99999926 	0.99999935 	0.99999991 	0.99999968 	0.99999981 	0.99999993 	0.99999957 	0.99999966 	0.99999660 	0.99999954 	0.99999977 	0.99999901 	0.99999998 	0.99999795 	0.99999897 	0.99999976 	0.99999998 	0.99999996 	0.99999858 	
  b. 0.99999899 	0.99999946 	0.99999985 	0.99999969 	0.99998630 	0.99998776 	0.99999929 	0.99999988 	0.99999915 	0.99999995 	0.99999809 	0.99999988 	0.40005280 	0.99999993 	0.99999970 	0.99999999 	0.99998697 	0.99999273 	0.99999987 	0.99999917 	0.99999693 	0.99999937 	0.99999978 	0.99999952 	0.99999789 	0.99999994 	0.99999859 	0.99999999 	0.99999992 	0.99999990 	0.99999976 	0.99999988 	0.99999792 	0.99999981 	0.99999978 	1.00000000 	
  c. 0.30000695 	0.99999987 	0.99999980 	0.99999941 	0.99999868 	0.99999986 	0.99999985 	0.99999061 	0.99999959 	0.99999948 	0.99999992 	0.99999970 	0.99999999 	0.99999975 	0.99999973 	0.99999995 	0.99999954 	0.99999953 	0.99999994 	0.99999934 	0.49938421 	0.99999465 	0.99999935 	0.99999981 	0.99999889 	1.00000000 	0.99999924 	0.99999990 	0.99999539 	0.99999994 	0.99999995 	0.99999953 	0.99999994 	0.99999961 	0.99999973 	0.99999493